Yes, the LP might be a tad warmer and more full bodied, but I had to really focus to hear significant differences. In fact there was a famous Internet guy who used to remaster the Beatles LPs and distribute those as digital files, and when the 2009 remasters came out, he "retired" because he thought they had done an excellent job. It also references … The original stereo mix isolated the mellotron pulse to the right-hand side, and couldn’t be repaired by the surface-level edits made in previous remastering projects. We delete comments that violate our policy, which we encourage you to read. May not be better than the 87's to some but I was happy to get the Beatles canon upgraded in 09. A double LP set Past Masters, Volumes One & Twowas subsequently released in the United States on 24 October 1988 and in the United Kingdom on 10 November 1988. The short minidocumentaries are generally pretty good. Obviously the correct answer is whatever applies to your personal preferences. The set compiles every song released commercially by the band that was not available on the Beatles' 12 original UK albums or the US Magical Mystery Tour LP. A two-CD set, Past Masters, containing both volumes, was issued on … They're good, but do the remastered Beatles CDs offer a big enough sonic improvement over the 1987 CDs to make them essential? Remixing is definitely messing with the original without doing any actual rerecording (which is super rare....unless you're Ozzy). The first instance is the posthumous changes when the album was remastered and released on 09/09/09. Now With This Remastered 180 Gram Mono Vinyl Release, We Can Relive This Astonishing Album Once Again , Listening To The Beatles Magic As If We Are Hearing It For The First Time, Brilliant Tracks Such As , It Won"t Be Long , Little Child An Please Mister Postman , On Side 1. The stereo box set is packaged in a hard, glossy black lift-top box with a magnetic clasp. The two volumes were included in The Beatles Box Set. Listen over a decent quality hi-fi or home theater system and those improvements are definitely worthwhile. On Sept. 9, Apple and EMI will release all of The Beatles' albums, newly remastered and sounding better than ever. Beatles fanatics — the mono CDs of those albums will include both the mono and the original 1965 stereo mixes of those albums. The 09's were a sonic jubilation for me. Audio CD $33.24 $ 33. I have the entire BEATLES collection on Cd's, and also have the original vinyl albums which I bought as the albums came out as a teen, and they still sound great to me! Those eight remastered CDs aren't bad, but the 2009 CDs cream them. ), Forum Policies, Rules, and Terms of Service. I agree with your comment Kiddo4. No, the stereo placements don't match the original mixes. Way North Of Hollywood, CA in Portland , OR, (You must log in or sign up to reply here. The good news is just how close the LP and CD sound! Most 2009 Beatles CDs were mastered from the original, stereo analog master tapes, but … Be respectful, keep it civil and stay on topic. Early pressings came with a posterboard fold-out insert protecting the LP. Current Beatles engineer Allan Rouse explains the difference between remixing and remastering: The “Yellow Submarine Song Songtrack” was a ‘remix’ which required going back to the original multi-track tapes and recreating a new stereo (and 5.1 surround for the film soundtrack). The colors of the new CDs' covers and booklets pale next to the original British LP covers. The 2009 remasters are louder than the 1987 versions, so a quick comparison might lead you to believe the remaster is "better" simply because it's a little louder. Those are, however, available only in the mono boxed set, which includes the 10 albums (through “The Beatles,” popularly known as the “White Album”) that were mixed separately for mono and stereo in the So why is it universally agreed that 2009 masters are great? The center labels were removed from old records and the vinyl was then melted down a… These will promote the products, films, events, news and updates about the Beatles, about all four members of the Beatles taken separately, and about other members of the Apple group of companies and carefully selected third parties such as Cirque Du Soleil companies, Universal Music companies, MPL (McCartney Productions Limited) and Harrisongs Limited. And the music seems more dynamically alive. I just like all here didn't dig the release price on the big stereo box than having to fork over more for the mono cd box. On Murmurs.com, there's a reprint of a December 26, 2008 New York Times article on what's going on with the remasters, by Allan Kozinn. Rather than buy the new Beatles CDs, buy better headphones or speakers. Then tell me what you hear. Most 2009 Beatles CDs were mastered from the original, stereo analog master tapes, but "Help" for example, was remastered from producer George Martin's 1986 digital master. Lol. But the digipak and booklet color printing seem a bit off compared with my original 1960s British LPs. I compared two of the better sounding CDs, "The Beatles (The White Album)" and "Abbey Road" over my iPod, using my Monster Turbine in-ear headphones, and over my computer, with Audioengine2 speakers. Past Masters was originally issued as two separate CDs Past Masters, Volume One and Past Masters, Volume Two, on 7 March 1988. Past Masters is a two-disc compilation album set by the English rock band the Beatles.It was originally released as two separate volumes on 7 March 1988, as part of the first issue of the band's catalogue on compact disc. Too bad those qualities evaporate over iPods, computer speakers, and car systems. Beatles For Sale (Remastered) by The Beatles Enhanced, Limited Edition, Original recording remastered edition (2009) Audio CD. Sound aside, the new digipaks look way better than the 1987 jewel boxes, and the new booklets are loaded with rare photos, many of which even I, a fairly devoted Beatles fan, have never seen. Only 3 left in stock - order soon. 24. THE newly remastered CDs of the Beatles’ original albums and singles, which EMI and Apple Corps, the Beatles’ company, are releasing on Wednesday, have … Primarily, this album is a new technology fiend’s dream. In the same way as the “Anthology” and “Help!” Thing is, with the 2009 remasters we're talking about fairly subtle improvements in clarity, especially in high-frequency detail, overall spaciousness, and naturalness. Most Beatles fans I've spoken to prefer the Mono box and the original releases over the … "Help" is not one of the better ones, that's for sure. ... what I mean above is that it's no secret to me that the 87 CD's are better - Abbey Road and Let It Be are IMO amongst the best sounding CD's ever made. Like the 09's myself. The Beatles In Mono is a faithful reproduction of all the original mono mixes, while the stereo set has been remastered with modern tastes in mind. Switching back and forth between my VPI Classic turntable and Ayre C-5 Evolution SACD/DVD-A player, the sound was remarkably similar! Check out "Paperback Writer," for one. Tomorrow is the day (9/9/09) millions of music fans have been waiting 22 years for: The Beatles' studio back catalogue, remastered and available in two lavish CD box sets, The Beatles In Mono and The Beatles Box Set: Remastered In Stereo, goes on sale.These collections - the mono set is available for a limited time only and the stereo discs can be purchased individually or in the big black … The 70’s still produced great records, but the global energy crisis impacted the way vinyl was manufactured. $3.85 shipping. For example, try and listen to She said She said. We are making some updates and reconfigurations to our server. The Beatles’ remastered back catalogue has finally been released in mono and stereo by EMI and Apple Corps. Discuss: Don't buy the Beatles remasters, unless... Google Doodle celebrates basketball inventor. The Audiophiliac chats with the project's mastering engineers to get the inside scoop on the Beatles sound. Original master recording, remastered edition of the 1969 album. Have you bought the new CDs? Yellow banner at the top cover "Original Master Recording" White Mo-Fi label has the Capitol C logo. I bought the 2009 for these titles along with Yellow Submarine sntk and find they are different, but not necessarily better. The Beatles' US albums remastered: Review and overview. I also compared the 2009 remasters with some of "The Beatles: The Capitol Albums Vol 1 & 2" CDs that came out in 2006. Rather than using only “virgin” vinyl, they now began adding recycled scraps. The remastered Beatles catalog arrives on 180-gram vinyl in record stores tomorow (today in the U.K.). Not a huge Beatles fan other that for Peppers, White Album, and Magical Mystery Tour. The Beatles’ longest, strangest work is about to get a new look. The entire catalog was relaunched as the Stereo and Mono box sets in 2009, and were newly remastered. And I was listening in a dead quiet room, add some background office or street noise and the differences would be even harder to hear. The 87 version is much better in my opinion. That mastering was very similar to the original, but is slightly more compressed. Flesh tones sometimes take on a greenish cast (see my comparison shot of the "Beatles For Sale" LP and 2009 CD covers). Testing was undertaken over three generations of stereo pressings. © 2021 CNET, A RED VENTURES COMPANY. Mobile Fidelity's first Beatles release. Beatles remastered USB vs CD Reply #21 – 2010-01-12 18:24:18 Looking back over ten years or so of following HA, and r3mix before that, I only recall one instance where one person could reliably differentiate 16 bits from 24 bits, on specific material. Note 20 specs compared: All of Samsung's updates. Discussion threads can be closed at any time at our discretion. Get all 13 studio remasters of the Beatles' albums plus the previous Past Masters collection. It discusses what's going on (although no light is shed on the issues between the Beatles and EMI), the Purple Chick series, and the fans. The music industry relied heavily on expensive petroleum for vinyl production. The Beatles Remastered Vinyl albums in Mono released in 2014. The 2009 Beatles remasters are pretty good though. Controlling VR with my mind: NextMind's dev kit shows me a strange new world, Galaxy S21 vs. S20 vs. S20 FE vs. Can you hear the difference? The compact discs are available as single or double CD sets, a stereo box set, and a limited edition 13-disc set containing the original mono mixes. Many combinations of Beatles records could make sense as compilations - maybe too many. As a result, most labels cut costs by reducing the thickness and quality of their materials. If you're a Beatles fan with a home hi-fi, get the remasters. So if you compare old and new adjust the volume of both CDs to make them the same. Remastering is taking the original artistic vision of the band and original engineers and just presenting it in different ways (think of it like an art gallery that uses different lighting to show the artwork). The original pressing of Magical Mystery Tour (1967) was compared directly with the new version while I also decided to undertake a more considered test with the 1978 and 2012 versi… While engineers didn’t have to spend as much time on them as they did on the remastered … If you already own your favorite Beatles music, is it worth buying again? Your 'expensive new headphones' are obviously cack. I dont understand how any mastering engineer could accept the sound which is on the 2009 version of this song on revolver. I selected an original copy of With The Beatles (1963) which I proposed to test with the 1978, UK version of the EMI box set reissue (better sounding than the comparable USA and Australian versions and sourced direct from the master tapes) and the new 2012 copy. Beatles remastered USB vs CD Reply #37 – 2010-01-20 15:59:20 While your points about more pixels increasing the noise level per pixel, but decreasing it per image are correct - we are quickly approaching the point where digital sensors are diffraction-limited at … Ahead of its 50th anniversary (Nov. 22), a greatly expanded edition of 1968’s The Beatles … I also compared my Mobile Fidelity "Magical Mystery Tour" LP with the 2009 CD, and this time I preferred the CD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. A compilation of all the Beatles' chart hits would be lopsided toward the early years, particularly when three U.S. labels were competing with one another. by The Beatles 4.8 out of 5 stars 1,324. And there's more bass. Listening over my high-end, two-channel system they absolutely do! We compared the sound of the new Beatles remastered CDs with original LPs. I just didn't like the flatness of the 87 cds. Apologies for any downtime or slow forum loading now or within the next week or so. With all the hoopla surrounding the Beatles remasters, the question remains: How good are they? Discussion in 'Music Corner' started by HE1NZ, Mar 24, 2018. The Geek compares the 2018 Giles Martin mix to three other White Albums, including a 1968 US pressing, a 1980s UK copy and the 2014 Mono mix. They would make the Beatles music you already own sound better. Thanks! Mind you, the Turbine and Audioengine2 are a good deal better than average-sounding ways to hear music, and after I compensated for the volume differences between the 1987 and 2009 versions, the sound was nearly the same. There was something about the LP's harsher, brighter balance and pumped-up bass I didn't like. Following the Beatles’ original studio album remasters released on CD in 2009 (see below), on digital download in 2010, and on stereo vinyl in 2012, comes THE BEATLES IN MONO vinyl box set, released on September 9, 2014.. There was something about the LP's harsher, brighter balance and pumped-up bass I didn't like. But are the differences large enough to show up over an iPod, car system, or computer speakers? If you want to quickly know if you’re going to like Giles Martin’s The Beatles remixes start with “Long, Long, Long”.